skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!! - Page 2 - Racing Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Monday, December 11, 2006 5:12 PM
What band was that on that video? good song

Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Monday, December 11, 2006 6:58 PM
Quote:

Taetsch Z24
Yesterday 2:29 PM

you must rip out of the hole like no other, your gate speed sucks ass.

my 14.4's where at 97

some more timing and maby a 13.9


Chris


'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.9 @ 103.4MPH
205FWHP, 210FWTQ, STOCK PULLY
Team GREEN


Idk if you know this, but a lower trap speed with a lower e/t means you're a better driver. you're 97mph trap means you should have hit a 13. better luck next time.


Quote:

Taetsch Z24
Today 7:09 PM

riddle me this,


MY 60' times where 2.0's on wallmart rubber and i only had a dog bone lower for mods, and a curb weaght of 2920lbs

but your right, i could have done better. and i was boosted.

Chris
'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.9 @ 103.4MPH
205FWHP, 210FWTQ, STOCK PULLY
Team GREEN


I too, have a 2.0 60' on walmart rubber and I was n/a so I fail to see your point.

Also, you say you had just a dog bone, but then say you were boosted... so which was it?

if you're gonna talk smack, at least make sense





Edited 1 time(s). Last edited Monday, December 11, 2006 7:17 PM


Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Monday, December 11, 2006 8:01 PM
Only part that I could see him stating he had boost was to say he'd have more traction issues because of the added hp/Tq....

Good times Peej!


N2O + Bolt-ons = 220Hp/250Tq

Coming Soon:HpTunersPro, EagleConnectingRods, WiescoPistons, 13sec2200

Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Monday, December 11, 2006 8:08 PM
nice edit on the sig there



Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:41 PM
Taetsch Z24 wrote:you must rip out of the hole like no other, your gate speed sucks ass.

my 14.4's where at 97

some more timing and maby a 13.9


Chris


i ran a 14.5 and got a 95 mph trap speed. i think your launch sucks



Im a Xbox 360 fanboy...and damn proud of it!!
Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3:17 PM
http://www.tristatetuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=24901

check this out, i hate ppl like this



Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:23 PM
I though you had slicks? and weight reduction?

another thing, with the GM charger, once air starts going by it and cools it down it becomes more efficient, thus making more power.
I wasn’t dising you PJ, just though you would trap higher.

Chris



'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.7 @102.45 MPH Third Place, 2007 GMSC Bash SOLD AS OF 01MAR08

Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:26 PM
LiquidFireCavy (mdk) wrote:http://www.tristatetuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=24901

check this out, i hate ppl like this


What did you expect? Yes its good for a Cav to hit 14.0 n/a but other cars like Hondas have been running 14s, 13s, 12s, 11s and 10s all motor for years. I think one major thing those guys are considering is that its mentioned as a "swap", it may have a motor swap but it was swapped in a motor that could have come stock in that car. When Honda guys hear the term "swap" they think about motors that have literally twice the hp that the motor did that came in the car, i doubt they realize that this swap is just another Cavalier motor offered in the same chassis stock which really shouldn't be looked at as a swap.


- 93 mph in the 1/8 mile
Member of J-Body Of Michigan.

Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:44 PM
most of the import guys like that are ignorant kids who dont know any better i just ignore them and prove them different



The one, the only, ME.
Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:23 PM
I posted over ther eexplaining the car a bit more, we'll see what the response is

who cares... I beat up almost anything I came up next to at the track anyway

a psycho B series with 12:1 compression spinning 9000rpm in a car thats 800lbs lighter than mine doesn't impress me.. their tune will change once the car makes serious horsepower


who cares the party is right here !

thanks for the support guys, just remember if people talk smack cuz its a cavalier, it just hurts their feelings more when they lose





Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:28 PM
"Download is slow as poo, but a 14 @ 96 vs a stock SRT4's 14 @ 99? That tells me a stock SRT4 would be walking right past his ass at the 1/4 mile mark. How the hell are you planning on impressing somebody while running a slow 14?"

LOL, those ignorant #$%#'s are comparing skwirls car (NA, less then 10g's) to a srt4 (TURBO, 20+ G's) car and calling it slow!! I have seen MANY SRT4's that cant hit 14.0.... and they are turbo'ed! just cause c&d ran a 13.9 doesnt mean shiz..... skwirl ran a 14.0 N/A!!!!!

and skilz, you are completely right!! they have a N/A Swap with stronger motors, plus hondas are like paperweights... if we get a NA corvette engine in a cavy it would be fast. congrats, that means nothing!! eco in hitting 14.0 N/A is impressive, congrats skwirl!



|Forged 8.9:1 Wiseco Pistons|Forged Eagle Rods|HPTuners|60trim|Tial Wastegate|
|Precision Intercooler|2.5" Exhaust|2.5" Charge Pipes|630CC Mototron Injectors|
|Stock: Fuel Pump, Transmission, Manifold, TB, Head, Head Gasket, Ignition, Suspension...|

Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:39 PM
wow dude you owned them!! haha




Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 6:51 PM
You should have mentioned that your motor really shouldn't even be considered a swap at all since it was standard in every 03, 04 and 05 Cavalier and Sunfire.


- 93 mph in the 1/8 mile
Member of J-Body Of Michigan.

Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 9:05 PM
Honestly good job man. Keep up the good work. I say screw the turbo and build N/A.

PSN ID: Phatchance249

Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:36 AM
Taetsch Z24 wrote:I though you had slicks? and weight reduction?

another thing, with the GM charger, once air starts going by it and cools it down it becomes more efficient, thus making more power.
I wasn’t dising you PJ, just though you would trap higher.

Chris


methinks you're thinking of stampflee.... pj's just on drag radials (stickier than standard street rubber but not nearly as sticky as "slicks") and he had no weight reduction besides taking the spare tire out..... he's just 115 lbs lol. The 2.0 60' on walmart rubber he mentioned were pre-headswap, when he literally had a pair of $40 tires on the front.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edited Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:50 AM



Arrival Blue 04 LS Sport
Eco
Turbo
Megasquirt
'Nuff said
Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:10 PM
i was still a Lance Corpral when i ran thoes times, i dident have any money to by anything but wallmart rubber.

Chris


'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.7 @102.45 MPH Third Place, 2007 GMSC Bash SOLD AS OF 01MAR08

Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Wednesday, December 13, 2006 8:32 PM
DaFlyinSkwirl (PJ) - BPU++ wrote:I posted over ther eexplaining the car a bit more, we'll see what the response is

who cares... I beat up almost anything I came up next to at the track anyway

a psycho B series with 12:1 compression spinning 9000rpm in a car thats 800lbs lighter than mine doesn't impress me.. their tune will change once the car makes serious horsepower


who cares the party is right here !

thanks for the support guys, just remember if people talk smack cuz its a cavalier, it just hurts their feelings more when they lose



See this is what i dont get at all ... im not trying to call you out, or start a online fight or any bull@!#$ like that ( you know me peej, and you know i respect you and the car ) ...

but yet you mock the higher revving , higher compression engine?
Thats stooping down to their level, isnt it? Shouldnt a true car enthusiast reconize the higher compression , high revving, and not mock it for what it is.

Did you not RAISE your stock rev limiter from 6500 to 7500?

Isnt that a bit hipocritical of you?

I really didnt want to say that honestly, but its just bothering me.

And of course thats the response your going to get from any forum , any forum at all ... Everyone thinks what they drive is better then what everyone else drives, and SRT4 owners to boot. 90% of them think they own the ground you walk on because they can run 13s stock.

It doesn't impress me that they can do that STOCK, because your average joe can buy it and run it, but you did all the work to your car yourself, and did the time, money , research , trial and error ... etc . Other people aren't going to see or appreciate that , unless they know the facts , and/or are TRUE CAR people.









Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Wednesday, December 13, 2006 9:00 PM
LiquidFireCavy (mdk) wrote:http://www.tristatetuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=24901

check this out, i hate ppl like this


I added my .02 in there.







Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:19 AM
Acer wrote:"Download is slow as poo, but a 14 @ 96 vs a stock SRT4's 14 @ 99? That tells me a stock SRT4 would be walking right past his ass at the 1/4 mile mark. How the hell are you planning on impressing somebody while running a slow 14?"

LOL, those ignorant #$%#'s are comparing skwirls car (NA, less then 10g's) to a srt4 (TURBO, 20+ G's)


Not to be a prick here ... BUT , uhm , the SRT4 whole sceme selling was the fastest car UNDER 20g's , and you can pick a used one up for 12,500 ...

So the pricerange your thinking of is a bit lengthened ...







Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:47 AM
yea thats tru and a used cavalier is about 8 grand, throw boost on it for 2 grand thats 10 right there, and still faster than the srt4 . and that two grand incoporates not only boost parts but also boost accessories If you know how to shop for parts....



Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:32 AM
once theres a turbo on it then ppl will have a whole new set of excuses but to be honest where are all these 13 sec NA hondas, i havent seen them at the track and if they are they are gutted hatches weighing 2000 lbs and not even close to a car you could drive on the street



1989 Turbo Trans Am #82, 2007 Cobalt SS G85






Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Thursday, December 14, 2006 12:52 PM
JerseyKid (Boosted&JDM) wrote:
DaFlyinSkwirl (PJ) - BPU++ wrote:I posted over ther eexplaining the car a bit more, we'll see what the response is

who cares... I beat up almost anything I came up next to at the track anyway

a psycho B series with 12:1 compression spinning 9000rpm in a car thats 800lbs lighter than mine doesn't impress me.. their tune will change once the car makes serious horsepower


who cares the party is right here !

thanks for the support guys, just remember if people talk smack cuz its a cavalier, it just hurts their feelings more when they lose



See this is what i dont get at all ... im not trying to call you out, or start a online fight or any bull@!#$ like that ( you know me peej, and you know i respect you and the car ) ...

but yet you mock the higher revving , higher compression engine?
Thats stooping down to their level, isnt it? Shouldnt a true car enthusiast reconize the higher compression , high revving, and not mock it for what it is.


where do I mock them?


Quote:


Did you not RAISE your stock rev limiter from 6500 to 7500?

Isnt that a bit hipocritical of you?

see above.

Quote:


I really didnt want to say that honestly, but its just bothering me.

again, I didn't mock anything DJ, and I'm not being hypocritical either.


The reason I'm "not impressed" is because obviously a higher revving motor with forged internals and higher compression in a car that weighs 600lbs lighter than mine is going to be faster.

to be honest, I don't think I'm that much slower than other hondas with my same mods.. I wouldn't be surprised if I am about a half second behind or so but regardless, my times and performance aren't that lackluster compared to other cars with the same modifications

that's all I was saying






Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Thursday, December 14, 2006 1:10 PM
awesome times. alot of people on the .org are slower then that with more mods or boosted. haha

keep up the good work and keep us updated.






Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:30 PM
Rodimus Prime wrote:once theres a turbo on it then ppl will have a whole new set of excuses but to be honest where are all these 13 sec NA hondas, i havent seen them at the track and if they are they are gutted hatches weighing 2000 lbs and not even close to a car you could drive on the street




|Forged 8.9:1 Wiseco Pistons|Forged Eagle Rods|HPTuners|60trim|Tial Wastegate|
|Precision Intercooler|2.5" Exhaust|2.5" Charge Pipes|630CC Mototron Injectors|
|Stock: Fuel Pump, Transmission, Manifold, TB, Head, Head Gasket, Ignition, Suspension...|
Re: skwirl SMASHES ecotec n/a record AGAIN!!
Friday, December 15, 2006 4:19 AM
every1 talks so much crap about pj. This kid is all motor why doesnt everyone understand that! lol. ooo yea thats so slow blah blah blah if he boosted he'd @!#$ all over those cars. If you went 13 psi for 13 psi he'd merk all over wrx's, 1.8t's Srt4's...the list is endless. And all those honda guys talkin @!#$ on that forum.....he is already faster than all the type S and type R models in the cars they come in. When will people see the light. And if they want to see huge results from a swap ...tell them to check out Raven's Car Domain



Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search