most def a 2.4.. Oil fill..

and I'd rather have a quad4 for boost over a TC any day.. but don't wanna start a flamewar.

anyway awesome fire! just gotta batten down the hatches



Sven you totally quarterloafed your computer..

just cause it has a 2.3 intake mani doesnt mean its a 2.3

nice fire, will look like mine here soon once my stock GT kit gets put back on, sleeeeepaaa

alright................its a 2.4................done..........lol


*************Yea i spell liek wrong get over it*****************
** If i write in caps its cause im @ work and i can only write in caps cause the keyboard is a retarded CAPS only keyboard.**

That is for sure not a 04e turbo. It looks like a T4 turbine for sure and the compressor could be a 4" opening 60 -1 possibly. But deffinetely not a 04e . Here is my 04E compared to a Super 60 , both Turbonetics. I know its big but it is nowhere near that BIG> nice setup. We gotta figure out who this is.





01 Z24 Turbo /// First Reflashed Turbo AUTO MMMM YUMMY

Thats a 2.4 . Why would he convert it to a 2.4 power sterring pump and use a less flowing head possibly? Or modify his 2.3 to run the hex drive .I dont think so . For sure a 2.4


01 Z24 Turbo /// First Reflashed Turbo AUTO MMMM YUMMY

Its slow, not impressive at all. alot of people say suncavi at 11.9 is a track car and not a daily driver. Well what do you call that? That is strictly a track car. You could never drive that pogo stick on the street. When suncavi`s car rides like a cadaliac compared to this car. But on the other hand still quick for a Quad.





Who wants to dig.

Ok, I think that we have established that it is a 2.4, not a 2.3.




275hp & 306tq - 1999 2.2 ohv
13.2 @ 108 mph
-1996 2.4 liter + Turbo + Built motor + Torco + More boost = Lots o' Power
-2000 Mustang GT + 2004 Cobra motor, Whipple 2.3 supercharger,
built rear-end,Dodge Viper spec T56 6 speed, bolt-ons = wheelies at the track!!!!!

lol, you beat me to it Adler....... was about to change the subject....

It is pretty quick, but like Karo said, needs some better suspension.....

Dustin..... you make no sense at all.

I want more pics of this car




SPD RCR Z - '02 Z24 420whp
SLO GOAT - '04 GTO 305whp
W41 BOI - '78 Buick Opel Isuzu W41 Swap

The guy is from Oakville Ontario. That car was street legal last year, he raced it with a front bumper on it. This year I guess its not so street legal! From what I have heard that is a stock suspension on there and he knows he has to change it soon.

SpeedRacerZ wrote:
Dustin..... you make no sense at all.

no, i think he makes perfect sense. for the size turbo that thing is packing, and the amount of work that appears to be done, a 12.5 is not fast at all, and even the 114 trap doesn't seem to be inline with what's done. granted, he could have been testing and obviously needs suspension to really get that power to the ground. Clearly, the setup has great potential (i sure hope that bottom end is built lol), and i make no claim otherwise. But if 12.5 is the best ET as of yet, that in and of itself is not very impressive at all considering how monstrous of a turbo that is.




Arrival Blue 04 LS Sport
Eco
Turbo
Megasquirt
'Nuff said

That suspension calibration looks to be meant for a RWD drag car.
Like to see people still working on the Quads and not just jumping on band wagons.




>>>For Sale? Clicky!<<<
-----The orginal Mr.Goodwrench on the JBO since 11/99-----

Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:
Like to see people still working on the Quads and not just jumping on band wagons.

And that last comment was towards Ecotec owners.
See that is bull**** if you think I just swapped to a Ecotec cause I am jumping on a damn band wagon or some kinda crap then you are wrong.
I was one of the 1st people to do a 5 speed Eco swap in pre2K chassis, there was 1 guy before me.

They are swapping to a good power plant that is it.

So what wagon am I jumping on swapping to a LSJ head and soon bottom?? GM's?
I would love to be on thier train. lol



Best time:"""11.946""" @ 114.73 mph @17psi 1.83--60"
11 second daily driver!!!!
Race Related 727-561-9440
Shop of choice for your 11 second J body!

Also, built bottom end and or top end LSJ and L61's available.
13's ----12's ----11's ----10's

I think you might have jumped to conclusions on that one Suncavi. Either way, 12.5 in a j is respectable. However, it definately looks like that car has some more in it.

How can anyone on here say that those times are not impressive without actually knowing how much boost the car is running, how much power it is making, weight, etc...?




275hp & 306tq - 1999 2.2 ohv
13.2 @ 108 mph
-1996 2.4 liter + Turbo + Built motor + Torco + More boost = Lots o' Power
-2000 Mustang GT + 2004 Cobra motor, Whipple 2.3 supercharger,
built rear-end,Dodge Viper spec T56 6 speed, bolt-ons = wheelies at the track!!!!!

Well, like I said, I don't know the full story on the car, but judging from looks alone, I'm not impressed by something that looks to be a full race setup thats only running mid 12's... That turbo could eat my fist and then chew up the stump like a woodchipper, and its only running 12's.... Just looking at that car you would think that its at LEAST a mid-11 setup.

Its pretty obvious the car was either out for testing and not going balls-out, had issues, or just the severely inadequate suspension was enough to keep it from performing, i give the guy that much. But there are cars on here running similar times at lower traps and much less extreme setups. So no, as of right now I'm not impressed. I'm sure once the issues are worked out I'll be plenty impressed, but as of right now, nope.




Arrival Blue 04 LS Sport
Eco
Turbo
Megasquirt
'Nuff said

Scarab (Jersey Jay 1.8T) wrote:Well, like I said, I don't know the full story on the car, but judging from looks alone, I'm not impressed by something that looks to be a full race setup thats only running mid 12's... That turbo could eat my fist and then chew up the stump like a woodchipper, and its only running 12's.... Just looking at that car you would think that its at LEAST a mid-11 setup.

Its pretty obvious the car was either out for testing and not going balls-out, had issues, or just the severely inadequate suspension was enough to keep it from performing, i give the guy that much. But there are cars on here running similar times at lower traps and much less extreme setups. So no, as of right now I'm not impressed. I'm sure once the issues are worked out I'll be plenty impressed, but as of right now, nope.

I'm sorry but that car does not seemt o be a all race car from those 2 pictures. There is sooo much more we would need to know. That could be a stock motor with boost. Yes they have converted to 2.2 coils with MSD, but heck lots of people do that on here with N/A cars. Lets say he was just testing and working out bugs still seems pretty dang good to me. More so when how many J's are in the 12's to be gin with? A very small list. I understand why you are saying what you said, but you should not be comparing it that way, but to how it stacks up against other J's which is very good!!!!!! I also agree there appears to be much more in that car, but still great times!!!

Yasmin man chill!!!! Truly no need for that comment. Do you feel quilty or what?????



FU Tuning

SunCavi_L61T3/T04E wrote:

Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:
Like to see people still working on the Quads and not just jumping on band wagons.

And that last comment was towards Ecotec owners.
See that is bull**** if you think I just swapped to a Ecotec cause I am jumping on a damn band wagon or some kinda crap then you are wrong.
I was one of the 1st people to do a 5 speed Eco swap in pre2K chassis, there was 1 guy before me.

They are swapping to a good power plant that is it.

So what wagon am I jumping on swapping to a LSJ head and soon bottom?? GM's?
I would love to be on thier train. lol

Holy insecurity complex.....

Why is that whenever someone mentions something that you take personal opffense to you reply, with some comment about how you were one of the first to land on Jupiter or swap engines in an F18.........

Mark P.

BHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
Poeple running 15's and 13's saying this car is slow. Thats gold!

I would hate to have to check the oil on that thing... LOLOOLOLOOLOOLOOLOLOL

gtpsunfire wrote:BHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
Poeple running 15's and 13's saying this car is slow. Thats gold!

275hp & 306tq - 1999 2.2 ohv
13.2 @ 108 mph
-1996 2.4 liter + Turbo + Built motor + Torco + More boost = Lots o' Power
-2000 Mustang GT + 2004 Cobra motor, Whipple 2.3 supercharger,
built rear-end,Dodge Viper spec T56 6 speed, bolt-ons = wheelies at the track!!!!!

Ok my car is not running I am little edgy. Bandwagon disregarded. lol
Good times, it is hard to get 12's out of a J I don't care what size Turbo you have, we lack the support in the other fields.


Best time:"""11.946""" @ 114.73 mph @17psi 1.83--60"
11 second daily driver!!!!
Race Related 727-561-9440
Shop of choice for your 11 second J body!

Also, built bottom end and or top end LSJ and L61's available.
13's ----12's ----11's ----10's

John Higgins wrote: but you should not be comparing it that way, but to how it stacks up against other J's which is very good!!!!!!

i am comparing it against other J's, and other J's with turbos HALF that size are running times like that. To be honest i think the entire compressor housing on the bug's turbo could fit inside the INLET of that thing! Like I said though its most likely he was out for testing in which case obviously those times were due to problems, poor state of tune, sandbagging, etc. I'm not trying to insult the car or the owner, I'm just saying that with a setup like that, i don't find a 12.5 to be that impressive.

Thats like if I saw a Vega all tubbed out with a big loping big block and wheelie bars and it only runs 12s... for what it appears to have the time isn't impressive. Yes, among other J's, its still up at the top, but for the setup he appears to have (and again we'd need more info) 12's just doesn't do it.




Arrival Blue 04 LS Sport
Eco
Turbo
Megasquirt
'Nuff said

You're right, since the turbo can push out enough air for 800 HP, then it must make 800 HP or the owner just has a terrible setup. Lame.

Maybe he enjoys the feel of a big turbo? Enjoys being able to drive out of boost, gets better gas milage with a larger exhaust housing, ect. Those setups running a smaller turbo will have more tunings issues, plus the turbo is being worked harder and won't last as long.

It's incomplete, has potential, but not impressed? Hardly.

O noes!