97 2.2 mods - Performance Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
97 2.2 mods
Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:36 PM
Ok i just bought a 97 sunfire with the 2.2 for my daily/winter driver. I want mods to add a bit more power and improve my mpg. i was gonna probably make my own cold air intake and i was wondering will a header help or hurt my gas mileage? Also what kinda power does a header yield on these cars? I drive a camaro and i know they wont yield anything close to the 40hp like on an f-body. Are there any fairly cheap ignition upgrades i can do for like multiple spark up to like 3500rpms or anything? Thanx for any advice.

Re: 97 2.2 mods
Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:43 PM
Intake an exhaust upgrades are minimal but effective. As far as just adding a header, I wouldn't suggest doing that if you're expecting a good amount of power. Remember, you're opening up the "cap" of your exhaust system with a bigger (diameter) header and your exhaust flow will be slowed down by the rest of your smaller (diameter) stock exhaust system. If you're going to just do part of your exhaust system, put a cat-back on first, you'll notice better gains.

I believe you can buy Ignition wires for your OHV for a fairly decent price and you can also buy spark plugs as well. Go to www.gravanatuning.com for the wires and you can buy plugs pretty much anywhere depending which company/kind of plug you decide to get.

If you have anymore questions just ask.



www.kronosperformance.com / 732-742-8837

Re: 97 2.2 mods
Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:48 PM
Oh ya if i did the header id just throw the stock cat back on with a high flow muffler of some type with a straight through design sorry i didnt mention that.
Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 12:03 AM
your exhaust is only as strong as the narrowest point. meaning if your exhaust is 3 inches but it's crushed down to 2 in one point, that's as strong as it's gonna get.

stock cat is still restrictive. so a high flow muffler would do nothing more than make sound and slightly improve performance but if you do a catback do it all the way you would be much happier with it. The Wider piping would do the car better

go all the way. high flow cat. good piping to a diameter of your choice, and a good high flow muffler.

you can get all of this done for less than 300 if you look for a shop



Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 12:04 AM
don't forget a high flow cat too



Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 12:06 AM
Inari (JimmyZ's Forgotten Son) wrote:your exhaust is only as strong as the narrowest point. meaning if your exhaust is 3 inches but it's crushed down to 2 in one point, that's as strong as it's gonna get.

stock cat is still restrictive. so a high flow muffler would do nothing more than make sound and slightly improve performance but if you do a catback do it all the way you would be much happier with it. The Wider piping would do the car better

go all the way. high flow cat. good piping to a diameter of your choice, and a good high flow muffler.

you can get all of this done for less than 300 if you look for a shop


Basically he said everything I was just about to say...

If you put a header on and a muffler, you'll still have the middle of your exhaust system as a major restrictive point, so in theory, you're gaining little power or atleast not as much as you would if you matched the piping size all the way through.



www.kronosperformance.com / 732-742-8837

Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 12:12 AM
*high five Adam*



Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 12:15 AM
"Dynomite!"



www.kronosperformance.com / 732-742-8837

Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 1:13 PM
i have a 97 2.2 with the 3t40 tranny. let me tell you that i've hardly felt any performance gains with my mods. i do however get better gas milage than i originally did. so if you happen to have the 3 speed auto in there, you'll get better mpg with intake and exhaust mods (provided you're not stomping on the gas just to hear it), but the performance gains will feel minimal. i've got a WAI, 59mm throttle body, pacesetter header, high flow cat and a cat back exhaust and my car feels slower than my girlfriends auto 01 sunfire and its stock. i'm not sure if anything i've said is helpful or not, but thats just my 2 cents.





Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 1:31 PM
alias1429 wrote:i have a 97 2.2 with the 3t40 tranny. let me tell you that i've hardly felt any performance gains with my mods. i do however get better gas milage than i originally did. so if you happen to have the 3 speed auto in there, you'll get better mpg with intake and exhaust mods (provided you're not stomping on the gas just to hear it), but the performance gains will feel minimal. i've got a WAI, 59mm throttle body, pacesetter header, high flow cat and a cat back exhaust and my car feels slower than my girlfriends auto 01 sunfire and its stock. i'm not sure if anything i've said is helpful or not, but thats just my 2 cents.


oh god yea. i even think my car has gotten SLOWER.




I was a retard, and now I'm permanently banned.
Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 4:53 PM
If you want the multiple spark, you can invest in an MSD DIS-II ignition control system and interface modules. It's a PITA to get to the coils on the 95-97s, but you'll be able to count the money you save on gas, and you get some basic ignition control features



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.

Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 5:01 PM
I have a WAI, pacesetter 4-1 header, full 2.25" exhaust to a straight thru magnaflow, comp cam 1.6:1 roller rockers, Underdrive Pulley (with no a/c), poly upper and lower mounts, and poly control arm bushings.

I've noticed every mod that I've done, thought it wasn't that great of a gain, it did feel a tiny bit quicker. The OHV's are not that responsive to n/a mods.



Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:00 PM
We also carry a wire selection of products for that engine. We also have most all the above parts in stock.


-Aaron
www.TurboTechRacing.com

Performance Parts For Cavalier, Sunfire, Cobalts and More!!!
Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:20 PM
I noticed improved MPG with just an injen intake and a flowmaster exhuast w/ 2.25 inch pipe....i can get in the 40's if im easy on it all highway

didn't gain any hp tho, still ran the same 1/4 mile times...its a 97 2.2 5spd



Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 9:15 PM
97cavy22 wrote:I noticed improved MPG with just an injen intake and a flowmaster exhuast w/ 2.25 inch pipe....i can get in the 40's if im easy on it all highway

40s? holy crap. it's been a while, but I think my cav was 25-ish (mixed city/highway, but still...)



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 9:26 PM
OHV notec wrote:If you want the multiple spark, you can invest in an MSD DIS-II ignition control system and interface modules. It's a PITA to get to the coils on the 95-97s, but you'll be able to count the money you save on gas, and you get some basic ignition control features


They aren't bad on the manual cars. I've installed them in under 10 minutes on a 5spd car. But that's on a lift lol. It took pulling the motor out to get them in my car, which is a 3spd auto.




I was a retard, and now I'm permanently banned.
Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:00 PM
Spotabee Racing wrote:
OHV notec wrote:If you want the multiple spark, you can invest in an MSD DIS-II ignition control system and interface modules. It's a PITA to get to the coils on the 95-97s, but you'll be able to count the money you save on gas, and you get some basic ignition control features


They aren't bad on the manual cars. I've installed them in under 10 minutes on a 5spd car. But that's on a lift lol. It took pulling the motor out to get them in my car, which is a 3spd auto.

Yeah, I've got a 3spd too. I went with pulling the intake manifold out (which was probably more difficult than dropping the motor ) I ended up relocating them the second time I did it (first was trying to get a tach signal, second was for MSD coils)



fortune cookie say:
better a delay than a disaster.
Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:11 PM
OHV notec wrote:
Spotabee Racing wrote:
OHV notec wrote:If you want the multiple spark, you can invest in an MSD DIS-II ignition control system and interface modules. It's a PITA to get to the coils on the 95-97s, but you'll be able to count the money you save on gas, and you get some basic ignition control features


They aren't bad on the manual cars. I've installed them in under 10 minutes on a 5spd car. But that's on a lift lol. It took pulling the motor out to get them in my car, which is a 3spd auto.

Yeah, I've got a 3spd too. I went with pulling the intake manifold out (which was probably more difficult than dropping the motor ) I ended up relocating them the second time I did it (first was trying to get a tach signal, second was for MSD coils)


I screwed with it for about an hour and a half before i decided, f*ck it, I pulled the axles and just dropped the motor down. Ended up taking me about 5 hours and 50 minutes longer than it would have if i would have just have gotten a 5spd car.




I was a retard, and now I'm permanently banned.
Re: 97 2.2 mods
Friday, November 04, 2005 5:03 PM
alias1429 wrote:i have a 97 2.2 with the 3t40 tranny. let me tell you that i've hardly felt any performance gains with my mods. i do however get better gas milage than i originally did. so if you happen to have the 3 speed auto in there, you'll get better mpg with intake and exhaust mods (provided you're not stomping on the gas just to hear it), but the performance gains will feel minimal. i've got a WAI, 59mm throttle body, pacesetter header, high flow cat and a cat back exhaust and my car feels slower than my girlfriends auto 01 sunfire and its stock. i'm not sure if anything i've said is helpful or not, but thats just my 2 cents.


The 59mm TB is too big for a N/A 2.2, theoretically the stock 52mm TB will flow more air than the engine can use. 56mm is about as large as you would want to go on a N/A 2.2 (mine was bored out to 55mm), before you lose too much air velocity and lose the low end torque. Try putting the stock TB/plenum back on, I bet it will get better.

As far as the intake, I started with a 3" set up. I switched out to a 2 3/4"set-up of identical design and my idle got smoother(gained about 1" of vacuum), throttle response got much quicker and I now have better low end torque. There was a negligible loss of power on the top end, but the gain on the bottom more than makes up for it.

Matt, unless you want to do some major reworking of the transmission, go with the mods that tend to be better with the low to mid range torque. These mods would be like a 2 1/2" to 2 3/4" intake(short ram/WAI), a 4-2-1 header and full 2.25" exhaust(including a high flow cat) and a 1.6:1 roller rocker conversion. Even with just these mods, a shift kit and stock replacement torque converter with a higher stall rating would be a big help.





Re: 97 2.2 mods
Wednesday, July 04, 2007 6:52 PM
'Scuse me Jack, but what do you mean by short-ram? Would that be in relation to the intake manifold? And what about 2 1/2 to 2 3/4"? I take it you mean air intake on that, do you not? If not, still I would like to know of one place that does supply aftermarket LN2 intake manifolds. And those 4-2-1( Also known as Tri-Y in old-school and Mopar ) header measurement numbers while we're at it. Would you please?

Go beyond the "bolt-on".
Re: 97 2.2 mods
Wednesday, July 04, 2007 7:44 PM
Wow, you dug one up from the past!

Yes, the intake referred to here would be the tubing from the air filter to the throttle body, not the intake manifold itself. 2 1/2" to 2 3/4" being to keep the air velocity up high enough not to kill the low end torque and a short-ram/warm air intake(WAI) to keep the response time down.

There are no reasonably priced after-market intake manifolds, that I would trust, for our motors. There is Mantapart and Venom, neither of which I trust.

As for the 4-2-1/Tri-Y header, they typically give better low to mid range response, when compared to a comparable 4-1 header. Building and tuning your own header, would actually be best. You can tune the primary length and diameter and the collector length and diameter. 2.25" is referring to the exhaust system behind the header collector. I don't have the exact specs on any Tri-Y headers. In fact the only one that I know of is the OBX header.







Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, July 05, 2007 4:50 PM
OBX? Tell me more, please! Like, where can I get one?

Go beyond the "bolt-on".
Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, July 05, 2007 8:17 PM
Nickelin Dimer wrote:OBX? Tell me more, please! Like, where can I get one?
Ummm...ebay.
I have a Pacesetter myself, it sucks.




fortune cookie say: better a delay than a disaster
Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, July 05, 2007 9:26 PM
The PaceSetter header isn't totally bad. The primary diameter should net you a torque peek at about 4100 rpm and a horsepower peek at about 5500 rpm, it's the collector that blows! Slamming all the exhaust pulses into that small collector (2.25" X 4" strait into the ball and socket connector), kills most of the gains to be had from a decent header.

In my case the primary diameter (1.5" O.D.) is good for the torque peek range I'm after. I could use a little more upper rpm horsepower, which would mean shortening the primary by about 1.75". A 4-into-1 collector with a 2.5" diameter and about 10" long (such as from Headers By Ed) should work wonders (relatively speaking) for my set-up. That and a 2.5" head pipe back to the 2.25" high-flow cat (step-up to a 2.5" spun shell cat possibly?), should add to the effective collector length, for better low to mid range response.






Re: 97 2.2 mods
Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:57 PM
here is a page with LT 4 exhaust port pics:

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Speedway/4955/head_shots.html

and this one has LT4 cutaway pics:
http://www.grandsportregistry.com/lt1vslt4.htm

sig not found
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search