Quote:
Ford's 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6, for example, can deliver upwards of 340-plus lb.-ft. of torque across a wide engine range – 2,000 to 5,000 rpm versus 270 to 310 lb.-ft of torque for a conventional naturally aspirated 4.6-liter V-8 over the same speed range. At the same time, this V-6 gives customers an approximate 2 mpg improvement and emits up to 15 percent fewer CO2 emissions to the environment.
Jookycola wrote:Quote:
Ford's 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6, for example, can deliver upwards of 340-plus lb.-ft. of torque across a wide engine range – 2,000 to 5,000 rpm versus 270 to 310 lb.-ft of torque for a conventional naturally aspirated 4.6-liter V-8 over the same speed range. At the same time, this V-6 gives customers an approximate 2 mpg improvement and emits up to 15 percent fewer CO2 emissions to the environment.
Is this a joke? because that right there is funny.
why even waste the time?
Jookycola wrote:Quote:
Ford's 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6, for example, can deliver upwards of 340-plus lb.-ft. of torque across a wide engine range – 2,000 to 5,000 rpm versus 270 to 310 lb.-ft of torque for a conventional naturally aspirated 4.6-liter V-8 over the same speed range. At the same time, this V-6 gives customers an approximate 2 mpg improvement and emits up to 15 percent fewer CO2 emissions to the environment.
Is this a joke? because that right there is funny.
why even waste the time?
Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Jookycola wrote:Quote:
Ford's 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6, for example, can deliver upwards of 340-plus lb.-ft. of torque across a wide engine range – 2,000 to 5,000 rpm versus 270 to 310 lb.-ft of torque for a conventional naturally aspirated 4.6-liter V-8 over the same speed range. At the same time, this V-6 gives customers an approximate 2 mpg improvement and emits up to 15 percent fewer CO2 emissions to the environment.
Is this a joke? because that right there is funny.
why even waste the time?
Well that's what GM's mild hybrid gives while making them slower over their conventional counterpart. Look up Aura and Malibu hybrid.
Ford's Ecoboost has the power of V8 while getting V6 fuel efficiency. And now with 2 mpg better fuel efficiency then the intake port fuel injection counterpart; which is now need for CAFE.
Not for anything, but please tell me where is the joke in this?
Sappy96 wrote:Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Jookycola wrote:Quote:
Ford's 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6, for example, can deliver upwards of 340-plus lb.-ft. of torque across a wide engine range – 2,000 to 5,000 rpm versus 270 to 310 lb.-ft of torque for a conventional naturally aspirated 4.6-liter V-8 over the same speed range. At the same time, this V-6 gives customers an approximate 2 mpg improvement and emits up to 15 percent fewer CO2 emissions to the environment.
Is this a joke? because that right there is funny.
why even waste the time?
Well that's what GM's mild hybrid gives while making them slower over their conventional counterpart. Look up Aura and Malibu hybrid.
Ford's Ecoboost has the power of V8 while getting V6 fuel efficiency. And now with 2 mpg better fuel efficiency then the intake port fuel injection counterpart; which is now need for CAFE.
Not for anything, but please tell me where is the joke in this?
Most v6 fuel efficiency isn't much more than GMs v8s.
Sappy96 wrote:Ok, and the GM DI 3.5L is making the same hp as the 4.6L v8 from the mustang GT as well.
DaFlyinSkwirl (PJ) - APU wrote:they couldn't pick a different name for their engine?
zetec FORD
duratec FORD
ecotec GM
ecoboost FORD
gimme a break.. you think they'd come up with an original name for once..
Sappy96 wrote:ROFL ecology boost
How about economy like fuel economy..
Good points Goodwrench.
I still think fords power plants are inferior.
Quote:
^^^^^Well I'd like to see GM coming out with similar technological progress instead of just trying to make better looking cars.